Working at Multichoice

Logos provided by

Ratings for Multichoice

  • Appreciation
    2.9
  • Company Outlook
    3.7
  • Fair Pay
    2.2
  • Learning and Development
    3.4
  • Manager Communication
    3.4
  • Manager Relationship
    3.8
  • Pay Policy
    2.3
  • Pay Transparency
    2.0
Find out what you should be paid
Use our tool to get a personalized report on your market worth.What's this?
United States (change)
How it works:
1
Enter city & years of experience
2
Add pay factors like skills & education
3
Find your market worth with a report tailored to you

Multichoice Reviews

What is it like working at Multichoice?

Good.
Learning and Development Specialist in Johannesburg:
Pros: The environment. The robustness of it gives one the edge to always learn ways to resolve issues.
Cons: Lack of recognition.
It's demanding both mentally and physically as you deal with different production companies.
Commissioning Editor in benoni:
Pros: The flexibility in the way we work. Encourage independent thinking.
Cons: Lack of resources to deliver on the expectation.
Too much manual work.
Support Technician, Information Technology (IT) in Luanda:
Pros: The possibility of helping users with their issues.
Cons: Too much dependency on South Africa.
My job at Multichoice.
Support Technician, Information Technology (IT) in Luanda:
Pros: I enjoy the fact that it is a large enterprise, with many users (which makes the experience very interesting) and I get to support several sites nationwide.
Cons: There isn't much ''space'' for skill development within the job itself.
It is challenging because we do everything at the same time it is not sagmented.
Call Center Representative in Johannesburg:
Pros: resolving customer's problem & restore picture on their tv screen
Cons: independent
Adventure of a Lifetime.
Senior Database Administrator (DBA) in Randburg:
Pros: The Daily Challenges
Cons: That there's no DECAF
Challenging.
Human Resources (HR) Administrator in Johannesburg:
Pros: The interactions with all sorts of employees
Cons: Management lacks consistency